Crises of reconciliation and leadership interlink

South Africa is experiencing at least two seemingly unrelated crises at present: a crisis of reconciliation and a crisis of leadership.

What do the failings of leadership in our country have to do with the failure of South Africans to overcome our differences and prejudices, 20 years into our democracy?

They showed that leadership involves an ability to put forward a unified position which best expresses and commands diverse interests.

Leaders cannot force unity for long by suppressing dissent without losing legitimacy.

How many poorly performing BBBs are now stacked against the investment grade reputation of the party of liberation?

Compared to the numbers exposed by the Panama Papers, the outcry over public spending on the president’s overpriced retirement home seems a bit overblown. But the president is a role model and, in this case, his misdeed represents a crisis of accountability that extends far beyond him, to the alleged capture of party and state structures by wealthy private interests.

Further still, these local instances point to a global crisis of accountability among world leaders, as exposed in the records of tax havens, in investigations into Fifa, in the Petrobras and other scandals of Brazil, in the crackdown on corruption in China; the list goes on.

As all the books are audited and accounts reconciled, it is increasingly clear that the speculative benefits of uninhibited global trade do not add up.

With most of the profits buried in offshore islands, a crisis of legitimacy is developing; all the while, populist fundamentalism spreads among the poor majority who bear the brunt.

Forget liberalism; expect authoritarian nationalism, repression and trade wars.

When things go well in accounting practice, reconciliation is just a simple, satisfying cancellation of debits against credits.

Yet this innocuous task of reconciliation is intimately connected to truth and accountability.

The truth of a general report is established by the reconciliation of its embedded accounts.

Hyped up by a commodities boom and a hot flood of quantitative easing bailout funds that flowed into high yielding emerging markets, such as Brazil, we spent our good credit as if there was no tomorrow. During the build-up to our spectacular hosting of the Fifa World Cup we all blew our collective vuvuzelas together as one.

Now we’re drying out in the bright heat of debt, individually.

To attempt national reconciliation after apartheid, as we did with the TRC, was not a simple task of ticking debits against credits. The great hope was that, if we uncovered the truth of our differences after the period of apartheid, this would help us heal our broken nation by forcing us to engage in a wider process of atonement, forgiveness and reconciliation.

But as Archbishop Desmond Tutu reflects, we possibly saved the patient in the ICU with the TRC but we then left her lying unattended in the general ward.

Reconciliation and leadership both involve bringing together differences under a general result. Neither imposes, nor substitutes, illusory unity over underlying differences but instead should reflect a balanced view of all the diverse, individual transactions taking place in the unified position.

During the recent impeachment debate in parliament, ANC MP Pule Mabe made a plea for forgiveness with a quote from the Bible.

In this context it is worth recalling a plea for freedom of conscience made in 1783 by the German Jewish philosopher Moses Mendelssohn: “Brothers, if you are for true piety, let us not feign agreement, where diversity is the evident plan and purpose of providence. No one thinks and feels exactly like his fellow man. Why do we wish to deceive each other with delusive words?”

We lay the blame for our disastrous conditions on the president but live in a democracy. Zuma represents too truly our indifference to the careful task of reconciliation that overtook us when the going was good.

If we want to live together, we all need to take account.

Dr Christopher Allsobrook is director of the Centre for Leadership Ethics in Africa at the University of Fort Hare

http://leadershipethicsinafrica.wordpress.com

subscribe

Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.