The Gauteng Health Department has paid R103 million to Ngcebetsha Madlanga Attorneys for work that included an opinion on terminating the Life Esidimeni contract‚ and opposing the two court applications that tried to stop the transfer of mental health patients to unsuitable NGOs where 144 died‚ it emerged on Wednesday.
This was disclosed by Gauteng Health MEC Gwen Ramokgopa in a written reply to questions in the Gauteng legislature by the Democratic Alliance’s Jack Bloom‚ he said in a statement.
The law firm was paid this money from October 2014 to September 2017. After that date‚ Ramokgopa said she was unable to obtain any reports of additional work “due to the exodus of senior legal officials who were directly involved in dealing with this service provider“.
Ramokgopa said the firm was first appointed by participating in a contract for a panel of legal service providers. A contract/service level agreement was entered into on January 4 2016‚ which was for ten months up to October 2016‚ and then an addendum was signed that extended the contract to end October 2017.
Ramokgopa said “there were no irregularities identified in connection with this law firm”.
Bloom asserted: “The amount paid to this firm is grossly excessive‚ and it is disturbing that much of this was for bad advice that contributed to the Esidimeni tragedy.”
He called for an independent inquiry into the payments made to the law firm.
In addition to work related to the Esidimeni matter‚ the firm did work on labour issues‚ medico-legal claims and some other matters‚ he added.
- TimesLIVE
Law firm paid R103m in Life Esidimeni scandal
This was disclosed by Gauteng Health MEC Gwen Ramokgopa in a written reply to questions in the Gauteng legislature by the Democratic Alliance’s Jack Bloom‚ he said in a statement.
The law firm was paid this money from October 2014 to September 2017. After that date‚ Ramokgopa said she was unable to obtain any reports of additional work “due to the exodus of senior legal officials who were directly involved in dealing with this service provider“.
Ramokgopa said the firm was first appointed by participating in a contract for a panel of legal service providers. A contract/service level agreement was entered into on January 4 2016‚ which was for ten months up to October 2016‚ and then an addendum was signed that extended the contract to end October 2017.
Ramokgopa said “there were no irregularities identified in connection with this law firm”.
Bloom asserted: “The amount paid to this firm is grossly excessive‚ and it is disturbing that much of this was for bad advice that contributed to the Esidimeni tragedy.”
He called for an independent inquiry into the payments made to the law firm.
In addition to work related to the Esidimeni matter‚ the firm did work on labour issues‚ medico-legal claims and some other matters‚ he added.
- TimesLIVE
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending Now
Latest Videos