Russia’s removal of troops from Syria ‘positive move’

CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT: President of Russia Vladimir Putin, centre, Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov, left, and Russian Defence Minister Sergey Shoygu at a meeting in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on Monday.
CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT: President of Russia Vladimir Putin, centre, Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov, left, and Russian Defence Minister Sergey Shoygu at a meeting in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on Monday.
Russia began withdrawing its forces from Syria yesterday, a move hailed as a potentially “positive step” for a new round of UN-backed peace talks seeking to end the conflict.

Warplanes at Moscow’s Hmeimim air base in Syria were being loaded with military equipment and prepared to fly back to Russia, the defence minister announced, after President Vladimir Putin said their military goal had been “on the whole” completed. Putin had on Monday ordered the withdrawal of “the main part” of Russia’s forces after talks with long-standing ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The surprise move won backing from Angola’s Ambassador Ismael Gaspar Martins, who holds the Security Council’s rotating presidency this month.

“The decision just announced today by the Russian president – that’s a positive step,” he said. “That’s what we like to see.”

But hopes for a breakthrough at the Geneva talks remained remote with both sides locked in a bitter dispute over Assad’s future. As the talks enter their second day, United Nations envoy Staffan de Mistura was expected to hold his first official meeting with the Syrian opposition High Negotiations Committee (HNC), who have repeatedly said that Assad could not be part of Syria’s political future.

But the withdrawal of the Russian troops – which began airstrikes in support of the regime in September, sparking condemnation from Western powers – is expected to put more pressure on Assad to negotiate during the Geneva talks.

“If the announcement of a withdrawal of Russian troops materialises, this increases the pressure on President Assad to finally negotiate in a serious way in Geneva a political transition which maintains the stability of the Syrian state and the interests of all populations,” German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said.

The Russian ambassador to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, also said the Kremlin’s move would boost chances of a diplomatic solution to the conflict now in its sixth year, that has killed more than 270000 people and displaced millions.

The White House said President Barack Obama had spoken to Putin following Russia’s announcement, and discussed the “next steps required to fully implement the cessation of hostilities”.

But US officials offered a more cautious initial assessment of the Kremlin’s decision. “At this point, we are going to see how things play out over the next few days,” a senior administration official said.

Russia began its airstrikes in support of Assad’s forces in September – a move that helped shore up the regime’s crumbling forces and allow them to go on the offensive.

Russia sent more than 50 warplanes to carry out thousands of strikes across Syria arguing that it was targeting “terrorist” groups, including Islamic State jihadists.

The intervention was slammed by the West and its regional allies, who insisted that Moscow was mainly bombing more moderate rebels fighting Assad.

A temporary ceasefire between Assad’s forces and opponents in the country introduced on February 27 has largely held, but does not cover the IS and Al-Nusra Front groups. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow’s Hmeimim air base and its Tartus naval facility would remain functioning and that some military contingents would stay behind.

He did not, however, give any details on how many soldiers would stay in Syria, nor whether Russia’s S-400 air defence systems would remain in the country.

Syria’s main opposition welcomed the Kremlin’s withdrawal announcement, but said it would wait and see what impact the order would have on the ground.

“We must verify the nature of this decision and its meaning,” spokesman for the opposition HNC, Salem al-Meslet said.

As the Syrian delegations arrived in Geneva over the weekend, Damascus warned that any discussion about removing Assad would be a “red line”.

Top Western diplomats immediately condemned the comment from Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem as divisive and provocative.

After his first official meeting with the regime on Monday, de Mistura said that “strong statements rhetoric” were part of every tough negotiation and that his initial discussions with government representative Bashar al-Jaafari were “useful”. — AFP

Please sign in or register to comment.