Nichols, a nominee of President Donald Trump, declined “at this time” to block other commerce department restrictions set to take effect on November 12 which would ban technical and business arrangements that were crucial to the proper functioning of the app.
Nichols’s detailed written opinion was expected to be released as soon as Monday.
The commerce department said in a statement it “will comply with the injunction and has taken immediate steps to do so”.
The statement, which defended the TikTok order and Trump’s executive order demanding owner ByteDance divest its TikTok US operations within 90 days, did not specify whether the government would appeal.
John E Hall, a lawyer for TikTok, argued the ban was “unprecedented” and “irrational” during a 90-minute Sunday morning hearing.
US judge blocks ban on new TikTok downloads
Image: REUTERS/ TOM BRENNER
A US judge has temporarily blocked a Trump administration order that was set to bar Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc’s Google from offering Chinese-owned short video-sharing app TikTok for download at 11.59pm on Sunday.
US district judge Carl Nichols in Washington said in a brief order late on Sunday he was issuing a preliminary injunction to prevent the TikTok app store ban from taking effect.
Nichols, a nominee of President Donald Trump, declined “at this time” to block other commerce department restrictions set to take effect on November 12 which would ban technical and business arrangements that were crucial to the proper functioning of the app.
Nichols’s detailed written opinion was expected to be released as soon as Monday.
The commerce department said in a statement it “will comply with the injunction and has taken immediate steps to do so”.
The statement, which defended the TikTok order and Trump’s executive order demanding owner ByteDance divest its TikTok US operations within 90 days, did not specify whether the government would appeal.
John E Hall, a lawyer for TikTok, argued the ban was “unprecedented” and “irrational” during a 90-minute Sunday morning hearing.
Is this the new TikTok? Time will tell
“How does it make sense to impose this app store ban tonight when there are negotiations under way that might make it unnecessary?” Hall asked during the hearing.
“This is just punitive. This is just a blunt way to whack the company. ... There is simply no urgency here.”
TikTok said it was pleased with the injunction and added it “will also maintain our ongoing dialogue with the government to turn our proposal, which the president gave his preliminary approval to last week, into an agreement”.
ByteDance said on September 20 it had struck a preliminary deal for Walmart Inc and Oracle Corp to take stakes in a new company, TikTok Global, that would oversee US operations after Trump said he had given the deal his “blessing”.
Negotiations continue over the terms of the agreement, and to resolve concerns from Washington and Beijing.
‘Tik-Tok’ king looks on the bright side
The deal must still be reviewed by the US government’s committee on foreign investment.
US officials have expressed national security concerns that personal data collected on 100 million Americans using the app could be obtained by China’s Communist Party government.
The justice department said a preliminary injunction would be “interfering with a formal national security judgment of the president; altering the landscape with respect to ongoing [committee on foreign investment] negotiations; and continuing to allow sensitive and valuable user information to flow to ByteDance with respect to all new users”.
On September 19, the commerce department had delayed the ban to give the companies another week to finalise a deal.
Another US judge, in Pennsylvania, on Saturday rejected a bid by three TikTok content creators to block the ban. — Reuters
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending Now
Latest Videos