'Basic economics': Minister Ntshavheni defends destruction of looted goods
Acting minister in the presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni has defended the decision to destroy goods recovered from last week's looting sprees in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal.
This following a public backlash after the government announced on Tuesday that recovered looted goods would be destroyed.
The public reacted with anger, saying it was senseless to deploy the army — which has been kicking doors in areas close to looted shopping malls to recover stolen goods — only for those to be destroyed.
Some argued that the recovered goods could have been donated to the indigent who were not party to the looting, or auctioned and the proceeds donated to affected small businesses.
But Ntshavheni said the looted goods were no different to counterfeit goods, which are also always destroyed when found.
This was because, should the looted goods be left in the ownership of the looters or sold at a giveaway price or donated, it would have devastating economic implications to the manufacturers of the looted products and have revenue-collection consequences to the country.
“Our people do not understand the things that affect the economy. The stolen good are no different from counterfeit products and that is why we destroy them,” said Ntshavheni.
“If the good are stolen, it means the manufacturers of those goods are not going to generate an income from them that enables them to pay employees and continue with their businesses.
“That money is also lost to the tax department because nobody is going to pay tax from auctioned or donated looted goods.
“When stolen goods are destroyed you are making sure the manufacturers can make replacement products and make them available in the market. The country benefits in terms of tax and companies continue to operate and pay salaries for their workers. That is basic economics,” she added.