OPINION |
Political parties offer few choices for voters
I really had to think very hard about my vote in the ward 18 by-election in East London on Wednesday. Four parties were contesting the poll – the ANC, DA, COPE and EFF.
It took me back to the first thoughts I had in or around 2008 about turning my back on the ANC at the ballot box.
Then it was about the ANC perverting what ought to have been immutable principles about democratic process, non-racialism, and honourable service.
I could no longer support the bullyboy tactics, the racism and the deployment of useless – and corrupt – cadres.
On Wednesday it was about my concern for local issues in my ward and this city.
I wondered if it is ever possible to think national but act local, because the spectre of what political parties are doing at national level loomed huge in my thinking.
That was brought into sharp relief by Floyd (again!) Shivambu’s racist outburst in parliament’s finance committee this week.
Shivambu has attempted to walk back his comments, suggesting that there was nothing racist in stating National Treasury deputy director general Ismail Momoniat undermined “Africans” by appearing in front of the committee rather than sending an … uhm … African.
I have long stopped regarding the unconscionable racism of EFF leaders as aberrant. I believe that, much as they are constantly strategising around policy issues, their racist psyches are front and centre all the time.
Shivambu has previously physically attacked Media24 journalist Adrian de Kock on the parliamentary precinct.
An even earlier racist rant came in 2012 when he called journalist Carien du Plessis a white bitch.
The outbursts are reflective of the formative political DNA of the EFF. But perversely racist, fascist, misogynist, ethnocentric traits taint almost all our political parties today.Julius Malema once explained away his abuse of British journalist Jonah Fischer as a “bloody agent” this way: “It’s Africa, you must behave in an African way. You are in Rome, you do what the Romans do.”
Well, I’m a (black) South African at home in South Africa, and I’ll continue to take a dim view of the kind of South Africa the EFF is trying to push us towards. I will walk away from the EFF each time we are called to vote, even as I may agree with their insights on some critical policy issues.
The less said about COPE the better. The party has been one of the biggest disappointments of the democratic era.
Formed from a band of Thabo Mbeki loyalists – but tellingly excluding Mbeki himself – after he was ousted from the presidency of the country, COPE was riven almost from the start by internecine disputes. This was portentous.
Under Mosiuoa Lekota, the party has never really been taken seriously in the big leagues and it is likely to lose black support over Lekota’s principled stand against land expropriation without compensation.
Lekota has denied his opposition to a new law allowing pasella expropriation was aimed at scoring cheap (white) votes but it is possible that COPE might have won a few votes this week from the propertied class in East London suburbs on the back of Lekota’s position.
What of the ANC? One really must feel for the party given its ham-handed race-based analysis of community voting patterns. Remember, provincial chairman Oscar Mabuyane once said that we all vote fundamentally for the individuals whose race most lines up with our demographic preferences.
So, according to Oscar, the mostly white residents of ward 18 would have voted for the party they perceive as having their race interests at heart.
That’s not the ANC, then. (Of course, I’ve happily called out his racist reductionism as rubbish. I’ve never voted on racial grounds. And today was no exception.)
But, the ANC will be dismayed that old (white) money in the ’burbs of Stirling, Vincent, Vincent Heights, Nahoon, Bonny Doon and Bunkers Hill still trounces its efforts to change the economy and, therefore, who inhabits these historically privileged areas of a tightly wrapped up ANC metro.
I have not voted for the ANC in two national elections and I’m not sure that the thuma mina moment (it’s not yet a movement) overshadows all the reasons the party has given me for not voting ANC.
But even if I had gone to the poll in ward 18 intent on making a rational decision in favour of the ANC, I would have been stymied by the ANC volunteers outside the polling station, who were unable to even tell me the name of their candidate, let alone anything about the work he proposed to do in the ward.That’s not the ANC, then. (Of course, I’ve happily called out his racist reductionism as rubbish. I’ve never voted on racial grounds. And today was no exception.)
But, the ANC will be dismayed that old (white) money in the ’burbs of Stirling, Vincent, Vincent Heights, Nahoon, Bonny Doon and Bunkers Hill still trounces its efforts to change the economy and, therefore, who inhabits these historically privileged areas of a tightly wrapped up ANC metro.
I have not voted for the ANC in two national elections and I’m not sure that the thuma mina moment (it’s not yet a movement) overshadows all the reasons the party has given me for not voting ANC.
But even if I had gone to the poll in ward 18 intent on making a rational decision in favour of the ANC, I would have been stymied by the ANC volunteers outside the polling station, who were unable to even tell me the name of their candidate, let alone anything about the work he proposed to do in the ward.That leaves the DA.
Almost all I have heard from the DA over about eight years of living in this ward has come via the telephone in the last couple of weeks. I had a notice in the post box when a council vacancy was declared in the ward.
Next came a series of messages and calls from the national call centre in Cape Town, some with a recorded message, others with a live person on the other side.
The last one – in the hours before I went down to the polling station – was from the party’s federal chair, Athol Trollip.
Out of respect for the person, I listened to the entire recorded message. Athol sounded like he was going through the motions. And that’s my real local concern about the DA in this by-election.
The party appeared to be going through the motions.
Party officials at the polling station decried the apathy among voters they had experienced on the campaign trail in the ward. But, there was never any doubt in my mind that it would win the ward with a runaway majority.
Mabuyane might be right – racial demographics allied to conservative mindsets and resurgent concerns about “ANC-gevaar” played the biggest role.
The only slogan I have seen or heard from the DA is “Keep your ward DA”.
But why should I keep “my” ward DA?
In my view, the DA seems to have done a really weak job of leading this ward.
The previous ward councillor upped and left without any explanation to the people who might have voted for him – and certainly without a thumbs’ down to those who didn’t. This from the party that regularly goes to court in the interests of transparent accountability.
The state of the ward’s streets, parks, refuse collection, crime and policing, traffic movements and many other local government indicators is no different to any other ward in Buffalo City Metro.
And how is the mindset of the various people who live, work or play in ward 18 different to those who live, work or play in any other part of the metro, notably in historically white wards?
How can we make this ward a better place for all? How can we contribute to the metro in meaningful ways through our efforts here? What does the IDP (integrated development plan) offer ward 18 residents or workers?
Is it possible to improve the quality of living here? Or to change the experience of people who travel here for work, or to go to school here? Does our councillor even notice that we have problems with traffic and pedestrian congestion? How do we promote good neighbourliness that affirms the humanity and rights of all? Do we do enough to promote good, ethical business practices in our ward?
The DA has offered me no answers to these questions.
And then, thinking nationally, I am still open to being persuaded that Patricia de Lille is a crook, but the party has made a humungous mess of how it has moved to oust her.
The silence from DA members – some of whose activities are reflected on my social media timelines – on the De Lille issue is deafening.
Do they no longer allow independent thinking or views within a party that perhaps ought to be the home for old-school progressives and individualists?
I’m also increasingly concerned that the party appears to be clinging to the “New National Party” conservatism of the former era, because of fears that white supporters will ditch it if it mimics too closely the policies of the majority black ANC or, god forbid, the EFF or COPE.
It was a freakin’ tough day of decision-making.
And then there’s 2019...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
This article is free to read if you register or sign in.
If you have already registered or subscribed, please sign in to continue.
Questions or problems? Email helpdesk@dispatchlive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00.