Tito Mboweni buys a copy of Magashule expose and will make 'his own conclusions'

I must say that from a conceptual and intellectual viewpoint, I find books which force me to agree with the author’s conclusions a priori very disappointing. Tell the story and let me conclude in my own understanding of the facts. pic.twitter.com/NzKibNIdec

— Tito Mboweni (@tito_mboweni) April 2, 2019

The title of a book explains the ideas contained within. It does not have to be ‘objective’.

In this case, Myburgh is telling you that his hypothesis is that Magashule runs a gangster state and is involved in state capture. The book itself will then make the case.

— Alastair McAlpine (@AlastairMcA30) April 2, 2019

Sir, you don't need to even read these books nowadays, just look around you in every town and city, and witness the wholesale corruption going on.

— Peterj (@Peterjrd98) April 2, 2019

In that case minisiter Madiba would have as his title "Long walk";
Alan Paton : "Cry"
Tolstoy: "&"

Sometimes there needs to be a bit of a clue about whats going on in the book.

— MySA?? (@linley_sa) April 2, 2019

How does any book "force you to accept the author's POV". Just read it and draw your own conclusions surely??

— Paul Volker - CFP (@PaulVolkerSA) April 2, 2019

It doesn't force you to agree. The content is the basis for the title but at least there is a basis. It is the ANC who forces you to agree by concluding it is fake news without even reading it, i.e. no basis

— richardwalsh70 (@richardwalsh70) April 2, 2019