THE country’s biggest teachers’ union has given Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga an ultimatum – “resign at once or we will render the education sector ungovernable”.
The SA Democratic Teachers’ Union yesterday demanded that Motshekga tender her resignation with immediate effect.
Just days ago the union called for Motshekga’s director-general, Bobby Soobrayan, to resign over the failure to deliver school books in Limpopo and other provinces last year.
Now it has turned up the heat on Motshekga.
Sadtu said it was turning its back on her after she decided, without consultation, to withdraw the agreement that protected collective bargaining by teachers.
The teachers are also angry about Motshekga’s plan to install biometric attendance registers in schools to track absentee teachers.
In a hard-hitting statement, the union said if the minister did not heed its call to quit:
l Its members would work “strictly within school working hours”;
l None of its members would be available to mark supplementary exams;
l They would not participate in any departmental programmes or take any instruction from the ministry or department; and
l Sadtu would lobby the other public sector unions to withdraw from the three-year collective-bargaining agreement that was intended to keep the labour peace.
“We have reached the stage where we can make a passionate call to the minister to do the honourable thing and take the road less travelled by submitting her resignation as the Minister of Basic Education with immediate effect,” Sadtu said.
“We are hopeful that this resignation…will have an annexure, the resignation of the director-general of the department.”
Last night, Motshekga responded to the call, by saying: “I’m disappointed about this trend of stakeholders choosing to communicate with the Basic Education Ministry through media statements.
“We are always committed and available to meet and discuss any concerns raised by unions, as we regularly do.”
The department would not comment yesterday on the union’s threats to disrupt teaching.
The 2012 academic year was a difficult one for Motshekga, with her department repeatedly making the headlines for all the wrong reasons. The biggest failure was the Limpopo textbooks saga.
Educationist Mary Metcalfe was asked to compile a report on the debacle and found that on July 3, when 98% of books were said to be in schools, only 48% of them had, in fact, been delivered.
Motshekga came under fire from her own party, the ANC, over the failure to deliver the books.
The ANC Y outh League said at the time that, as a “deployed cadre”, Motshekga was unable to protect the future and the aspiration to open the doors of learning and teaching.
The minister’s woes continued last year when pupils in Olifantshoek in Northern Cape missed school for three months because of protests.
In the Eastern Cape, the employment of about 4000 temporary teachers went to court, with several disruptions in teaching.
The education departments in the Eastern Cape and Limpopo were subsequently placed under administration.
While teachers in the Eastern Cape were fighting for their jobs, their counterparts in the Western Cape were fighting the closure of some schools because of a decline in the number of pupils attending them and under-performance.
Sadtu demands Angie quit over broken deal
The SA Democratic Teachers’ Union yesterday demanded that Motshekga tender her resignation with immediate effect.
Just days ago the union called for Motshekga’s director-general, Bobby Soobrayan, to resign over the failure to deliver school books in Limpopo and other provinces last year.
Now it has turned up the heat on Motshekga.
Sadtu said it was turning its back on her after she decided, without consultation, to withdraw the agreement that protected collective bargaining by teachers.
The teachers are also angry about Motshekga’s plan to install biometric attendance registers in schools to track absentee teachers.
In a hard-hitting statement, the union said if the minister did not heed its call to quit:
l Its members would work “strictly within school working hours”;
l None of its members would be available to mark supplementary exams;
l They would not participate in any departmental programmes or take any instruction from the ministry or department; and
l Sadtu would lobby the other public sector unions to withdraw from the three-year collective-bargaining agreement that was intended to keep the labour peace.
“We have reached the stage where we can make a passionate call to the minister to do the honourable thing and take the road less travelled by submitting her resignation as the Minister of Basic Education with immediate effect,” Sadtu said.
“We are hopeful that this resignation…will have an annexure, the resignation of the director-general of the department.”
Last night, Motshekga responded to the call, by saying: “I’m disappointed about this trend of stakeholders choosing to communicate with the Basic Education Ministry through media statements.
“We are always committed and available to meet and discuss any concerns raised by unions, as we regularly do.”
The department would not comment yesterday on the union’s threats to disrupt teaching.
The 2012 academic year was a difficult one for Motshekga, with her department repeatedly making the headlines for all the wrong reasons. The biggest failure was the Limpopo textbooks saga.
Educationist Mary Metcalfe was asked to compile a report on the debacle and found that on July 3, when 98% of books were said to be in schools, only 48% of them had, in fact, been delivered.
Motshekga came under fire from her own party, the ANC, over the failure to deliver the books.
The ANC Y outh League said at the time that, as a “deployed cadre”, Motshekga was unable to protect the future and the aspiration to open the doors of learning and teaching.
The minister’s woes continued last year when pupils in Olifantshoek in Northern Cape missed school for three months because of protests.
In the Eastern Cape, the employment of about 4000 temporary teachers went to court, with several disruptions in teaching.
The education departments in the Eastern Cape and Limpopo were subsequently placed under administration.
While teachers in the Eastern Cape were fighting for their jobs, their counterparts in the Western Cape were fighting the closure of some schools because of a decline in the number of pupils attending them and under-performance.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending Now
Latest Videos