US President Barack Obama’s administration has underrepresented the true number of civilians killed in drone strikes.
On Thursday, the news site The Intercept unveiled documents leaked by a whistleblower about America’s use of drones against terror targets in the Middle East and Central Asia.
Since taking office in 2009, Obama has vastly expanded the drone programme.
The US military describes fatalities from these strikes as “enemy killed in action,” even if their identities are unknown or they were not the intended targets, according to The Intercept.
And the strikes often killed many more people than intended, which runs counter to White House and Pentagon claims the strikes were precise and resulted in minimal casualties, it said.
Documents detailing a mission called Operation Haymaker showed that US special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people in northeastern Afghanistan from January 2012 to February 2013.
But only 35 of those casualties were intended targets.
And in one five-month period of the operation, nearly 90% of those killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets, The Intercept reported.
The US has better intelligence in Afghanistan than in places like Yemen and Somalia, where the ratios may be equivalent or even worse, it said.
The Intercept said the leaked documents came from a source it did not identify who works in the intelligence community.
US government statements minimising the number of civilian casualties from drone strikes were “exaggerating at best, if not outright lies,” the source said.
“It’s a phenomenal gamble.”
Asked about the report, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Obama “has obviously made a policy decision to try to be as transparent as possible about our counterterrorism operations all around the world.”
Those operations “go to great lengths to limit civilian casualties”.
The report said analysts create portraits of suspects and the threats they pose and present them in individual summaries known as a “baseball card”.
The information is then placed in a targeting package for action by higher authorities.
This approach allows for more subjective, mistake-prone human interpretation, the source said.
The documents acknowledge that the signals intelligence upon which the US military relies heavily in unconventional battlefields is “poor and limited”.
And yet this data, collected in large part by foreign partners, accounted for more than half the intelligence used to track potential targets in Somalia and Yemen, The Intercept said.
US drones hit more civilians
On Thursday, the news site The Intercept unveiled documents leaked by a whistleblower about America’s use of drones against terror targets in the Middle East and Central Asia.
Since taking office in 2009, Obama has vastly expanded the drone programme.
The US military describes fatalities from these strikes as “enemy killed in action,” even if their identities are unknown or they were not the intended targets, according to The Intercept.
And the strikes often killed many more people than intended, which runs counter to White House and Pentagon claims the strikes were precise and resulted in minimal casualties, it said.
Documents detailing a mission called Operation Haymaker showed that US special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people in northeastern Afghanistan from January 2012 to February 2013.
But only 35 of those casualties were intended targets.
And in one five-month period of the operation, nearly 90% of those killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets, The Intercept reported.
The US has better intelligence in Afghanistan than in places like Yemen and Somalia, where the ratios may be equivalent or even worse, it said.
The Intercept said the leaked documents came from a source it did not identify who works in the intelligence community.
US government statements minimising the number of civilian casualties from drone strikes were “exaggerating at best, if not outright lies,” the source said.
“It’s a phenomenal gamble.”
Asked about the report, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Obama “has obviously made a policy decision to try to be as transparent as possible about our counterterrorism operations all around the world.”
Those operations “go to great lengths to limit civilian casualties”.
The report said analysts create portraits of suspects and the threats they pose and present them in individual summaries known as a “baseball card”.
The information is then placed in a targeting package for action by higher authorities.
This approach allows for more subjective, mistake-prone human interpretation, the source said.
The documents acknowledge that the signals intelligence upon which the US military relies heavily in unconventional battlefields is “poor and limited”.
And yet this data, collected in large part by foreign partners, accounted for more than half the intelligence used to track potential targets in Somalia and Yemen, The Intercept said.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending Now
Latest Videos