Laying down the lay-by law

If you sign a contract that includes a clause which is not compliant with the Consumer Protection Act, does that mean that you forfeit that protection?

That’s clearly what tombstone manufacturer Willem Smith was getting at when I pointed out that refusing to refund money paid in a lay-by deal when the consumer cancelled was illegal.

“We do understand that the Consumer Protection Act states that a consumer can cancel a lay-by at any time and must be refunded payments,” he said, “but when a contract signed by the consumer states clearly in bold letters that we have a non-refund contract agreement and the customer signed it, then how will that work?”

Well, it doesn’t work at all, of course. Companies can’t contract out of the law and then rely on consumers not to know any better and sign their acceptance.

Prohibited clauses, such as “no refunds” on a lay-by deal cannot be binding.

The case in question was one of two I dealt with in the past week concerning lay-by deals.

What’s a lay-by? For those who don’t qualify for any form of credit, a lay-by is the only way to acquire something they can’t afford to pay cash for upfront in one go.

The system allows a consumer to choose an item – often clothing – and pay it off every month, with no interest added. The key difference between buying on credit and via lay-by is that with the latter, the goods remain the property of the store until the client pays in full.

In mid-October, Tshidi Ramutloa went to buy a tombstone from Smith Granite of Parys, Free State, paying R3000 on that day, and another R4000 the following month, believing it to be paid in full.

She told In Your Corner, via her daughter, that the company wasn’t able to source the specific stone she’d ordered, and hadn’t refunded her when she requested this.

Responding, Smith produced a contract revealing the full price to be R7750, meaning Ramutloa still owed R750 and that the tombstone would be erected as agreed only when the balance was paid.

Ramutloa says she was never given a copy of the contract, but in any event, she no longer wished to continue with the deal and wanted her money back.

It was Smith who used the word

lay-by to describe the deal, so I pointed out that the CPA states that a consumer can cancel a lay-by at any time, and must be refunded all payments minus just 1% of the retail price as a cancellation penalty.

In this case, Ramutloa was entitled to a refund of her R7000 minus just R70 as a cancellation fee.

But Smith has undertaken to refund the full amount, despite the NO REFUNDS clause in his contract.

In another case, Jameel Sayid of Durban put a lay-by on a R1300 pair of Adidas shoes in Side Step in Durban’s West Street earlier this month, handing over R800 as his initial payment, the verbal agreement being that he’d settle the balance within three months.

But when he later changed his mind, and told the store he wanted to cancel for a refund, he says he was told that “can’t happen”.

“They said I either have to pay the money in full and then choose something else, or forfeit the money.”

When I took up the case, a store manager said there must have been a misunderstanding, and Sayid was then refunded his R800 in full.

I have no doubt there are many, many others being denied their rights and forced to forfeit their lay-by payments illegally.

What to do

If you’re buying something on lay-by, make sure that the deal is properly documented, including the payment period, and the terms and conditions.

Ensure that you are only liable to pay 1% of the purchase price as a cancellation penalty, when cancelling for a refund of all payments made up to that point.

subscribe

Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.