I love hearing that readers have got justice for themselves by cutting out or printing one of my columns on the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and presenting it to the company employee who is denying them their rights.
Occasionally that’s met with a “well, our policy is ...” but mostly, it works, as was the case with Dave Hopcroft of Northcliff.
He bought an iron at Makro’s Strubens Valley branch in March, and two weeks ago, it stopped working – well within its CPA six-month warranty period, entitling him to return it for his choice of a refund, replacement or repair.
So back to the store Hopcroft went, “armed with your most recent article on returning defective goods”.
“At the customer service desk, I explained the issue and said I would like to have the iron replaced,” he said.
“After testing the appliance – which proved to be non-operational – the response was: ‘Unfortunately as it is outside the 14-day return period, we will have to send it in for repair’.”
That prompted Hopcroft to explain his CPA rights, as outlined in the In Your Corner column he was clutching.
“In response, she made a phone call to her supervisor, saying: ‘I have a customer here with a broken iron which was purchased two months ago’.
“A brief silence was followed by ‘Okay, thank you’ and then she proceeded to fill out a credit voucher.
“When I challenged her on why I was able to replace the iron only after I made a ‘CPA issue’, her response was that at the customer service desk, they are not authorised to approve replacements outside the standard Makro 14-day return period.
“It seems Makro’s policy is to see what they can get away with and only let the customer choose their CPA six-month recourse for defective products if he or she knows their rights,” Hopcroft concluded.
Asked to respond, a Makro spokesman conceded that “in hindsight, we could have handled the matter differently”.
“We always endeavour to deliver the best customer service and abide by the CPA, and as such will be doing a refresher CPA course with our returns and reception staff at Makro Strubens Valley.
“Our marketing manager at Strubens Valley has also contacted the customer to apologise.”
I later learnt that Hopcroft, on redeeming his voucher for an iron identical to the one which broke, was made to pay an extra R100 as the price has gone up since he bought the original one at the end of March. Given that the original iron became defective within six months, the replacement iron should have been provided to him at no extra cost. Something to add to the re-training session.
Feeling spare
Last year I asked motor industry ombudsman Johan van Vreden to list the five things he wished consumers would do before they bought a used car.
Among them was this: “Check that the vehicle’s service history is up to date and that the service book is in the vehicle. And make sure that there is a spare key for the vehicle.”
That should tell you how often dealerships don’t provide these two vital things with the used cars they sell.
What they do come up with are promises that the service book and/or spare key will be provided “later”, but that seldom happens.
I always advise people to walk away from the deal – and the dealership – if either of those things aren’t available at the time they want you to sign on the dotted line, because so many of the car-related stories that land in my inbox start with problems related to a missing service history or spare key.
It’s never a good sign.
So I wasn’t surprised to see a missing spare key saga among the case studies in the Motor Industry Ombudsman of SA’s 2016 annual report, released last week.
A consumer (neither the consumer nor the dealerships are ever named in MIOSA case studies, sadly) bought a used vehicle from a franchised dealer, with the dealer promising to give him the spare key “at a later stage”.
A week later, he discovered some faults and reported these to the dealer, attempting to make a date to take the car in for them to be rectified, and to collect the spare key.
“But the dealers told him they would tell him when to bring the car in for repairs and collect the key.”
And then the dealer closed down. In such cases, the CPA and MIOSA’s code of conduct entitle the office to refer a complaint to anyone in the supply chain, so they approached the car’s importer, which refunded the consumer the cost of the repairs and supplied him with a spare key free of charge. Good to know!
CONTACT WENDY:
E-mail: consumer@knowler.co.za
Twitter: @wendyknowler
Consumer column helps to iron out CPA issues
Occasionally that’s met with a “well, our policy is ...” but mostly, it works, as was the case with Dave Hopcroft of Northcliff.
He bought an iron at Makro’s Strubens Valley branch in March, and two weeks ago, it stopped working – well within its CPA six-month warranty period, entitling him to return it for his choice of a refund, replacement or repair.
So back to the store Hopcroft went, “armed with your most recent article on returning defective goods”.
“At the customer service desk, I explained the issue and said I would like to have the iron replaced,” he said.
“After testing the appliance – which proved to be non-operational – the response was: ‘Unfortunately as it is outside the 14-day return period, we will have to send it in for repair’.”
That prompted Hopcroft to explain his CPA rights, as outlined in the In Your Corner column he was clutching.
“In response, she made a phone call to her supervisor, saying: ‘I have a customer here with a broken iron which was purchased two months ago’.
“A brief silence was followed by ‘Okay, thank you’ and then she proceeded to fill out a credit voucher.
“When I challenged her on why I was able to replace the iron only after I made a ‘CPA issue’, her response was that at the customer service desk, they are not authorised to approve replacements outside the standard Makro 14-day return period.
“It seems Makro’s policy is to see what they can get away with and only let the customer choose their CPA six-month recourse for defective products if he or she knows their rights,” Hopcroft concluded.
Asked to respond, a Makro spokesman conceded that “in hindsight, we could have handled the matter differently”.
“We always endeavour to deliver the best customer service and abide by the CPA, and as such will be doing a refresher CPA course with our returns and reception staff at Makro Strubens Valley.
“Our marketing manager at Strubens Valley has also contacted the customer to apologise.”
I later learnt that Hopcroft, on redeeming his voucher for an iron identical to the one which broke, was made to pay an extra R100 as the price has gone up since he bought the original one at the end of March. Given that the original iron became defective within six months, the replacement iron should have been provided to him at no extra cost. Something to add to the re-training session.
Feeling spare
Last year I asked motor industry ombudsman Johan van Vreden to list the five things he wished consumers would do before they bought a used car.
Among them was this: “Check that the vehicle’s service history is up to date and that the service book is in the vehicle. And make sure that there is a spare key for the vehicle.”
That should tell you how often dealerships don’t provide these two vital things with the used cars they sell.
What they do come up with are promises that the service book and/or spare key will be provided “later”, but that seldom happens.
I always advise people to walk away from the deal – and the dealership – if either of those things aren’t available at the time they want you to sign on the dotted line, because so many of the car-related stories that land in my inbox start with problems related to a missing service history or spare key.
It’s never a good sign.
So I wasn’t surprised to see a missing spare key saga among the case studies in the Motor Industry Ombudsman of SA’s 2016 annual report, released last week.
A consumer (neither the consumer nor the dealerships are ever named in MIOSA case studies, sadly) bought a used vehicle from a franchised dealer, with the dealer promising to give him the spare key “at a later stage”.
A week later, he discovered some faults and reported these to the dealer, attempting to make a date to take the car in for them to be rectified, and to collect the spare key.
“But the dealers told him they would tell him when to bring the car in for repairs and collect the key.”
And then the dealer closed down. In such cases, the CPA and MIOSA’s code of conduct entitle the office to refer a complaint to anyone in the supply chain, so they approached the car’s importer, which refunded the consumer the cost of the repairs and supplied him with a spare key free of charge. Good to know!
CONTACT WENDY:
E-mail: consumer@knowler.co.za
Twitter: @wendyknowler
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending Now
Latest Videos