British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said on Thursday he was prepared to ignore orders from European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) which imposed a temporary emergency injunction on deportations of asylum seekers to Rwanda.
"Are there circumstances in which I'm prepared to move ahead in the face of Rule 39? The answer is clearly yes," Sunak said during press conference about provision a day after he overcame a rebellion by Conservative lawmakers on his proposed law to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.
Meanwhile, Britain's statistics authority criticised Sunak's statement that his government had cleared a legacy backlog of asylum decisions by the end of 2023, saying it might affect "public trust" as some cases were unresolved.
Sunak has made "stopping the boats" one of his top five priorities and is seeking to revive a plan to send asylum seekers who arrive in Britain on small boats to Rwanda after it was blocked by the courts.
The government said earlier this month it had met a pledge made by Sunak to clear by the end of 2023 a so-called legacy backlog of 92,000 asylum claims which were made before a June 2022 change in immigration law.
But the opposition Labour Party disputed the government's statement, citing official statistics showing 4,537 of those asylum applicants were still awaiting an initial decision over their application as of December 28.
The government said these were complex cases that required extra work, but Robert Chote, chair of the UK Statistics Authority, said the government had never previously argued that such cases should be excluded when calculating the backlog."It is not surprising that the government's claim has been greeted with scepticism and that some people may feel misled when these 'hard cases' remain in the official estimates of the legacy backlog," Chote said in a letter to opposition lawmakers.
"This episode may affect public trust when the government sets targets and announces whether they have been met."Chote also criticised the government for not supplying journalists with the data behind the statement when it first said it had eliminated the backlog."
This does not support our expectations around intelligent transparency, and we have raised this with the Home Office," he added.
The Home Office, Britain's interior ministry, has noted Chote's letter and has said it is fully committed to transparency.
Reuters
UK PM Sunak: I'm prepared to ignore court orders that halt migrant deportations to Rwanda
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said on Thursday he was prepared to ignore orders from European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) which imposed a temporary emergency injunction on deportations of asylum seekers to Rwanda.
"Are there circumstances in which I'm prepared to move ahead in the face of Rule 39? The answer is clearly yes," Sunak said during press conference about provision a day after he overcame a rebellion by Conservative lawmakers on his proposed law to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.
Meanwhile, Britain's statistics authority criticised Sunak's statement that his government had cleared a legacy backlog of asylum decisions by the end of 2023, saying it might affect "public trust" as some cases were unresolved.
Sunak has made "stopping the boats" one of his top five priorities and is seeking to revive a plan to send asylum seekers who arrive in Britain on small boats to Rwanda after it was blocked by the courts.
The government said earlier this month it had met a pledge made by Sunak to clear by the end of 2023 a so-called legacy backlog of 92,000 asylum claims which were made before a June 2022 change in immigration law.
But the opposition Labour Party disputed the government's statement, citing official statistics showing 4,537 of those asylum applicants were still awaiting an initial decision over their application as of December 28.
The government said these were complex cases that required extra work, but Robert Chote, chair of the UK Statistics Authority, said the government had never previously argued that such cases should be excluded when calculating the backlog."It is not surprising that the government's claim has been greeted with scepticism and that some people may feel misled when these 'hard cases' remain in the official estimates of the legacy backlog," Chote said in a letter to opposition lawmakers.
"This episode may affect public trust when the government sets targets and announces whether they have been met."Chote also criticised the government for not supplying journalists with the data behind the statement when it first said it had eliminated the backlog."
This does not support our expectations around intelligent transparency, and we have raised this with the Home Office," he added.
The Home Office, Britain's interior ministry, has noted Chote's letter and has said it is fully committed to transparency.
Reuters
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Trending Now
Latest Videos