×

We've got news for you.

Register on DispatchLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

'Tantamount to a gagging order': Judge dismisses Mama Jackie's urgent case

The high court in Joburg has dismissed an urgent application brought by Mama Jackie to force Amanda Du-Pont and Masechaba Khumalo to delete their social media posts. File photo.
The high court in Joburg has dismissed an urgent application brought by Mama Jackie to force Amanda Du-Pont and Masechaba Khumalo to delete their social media posts. File photo.
Image: Gallo Images/Daily Sun/Sipho Mchunu

The high court in Johannesburg has dismissed an urgent application by Jacqueline "Mama Jackie" Mpambani demanding that rape claims against her son be removed from social media.

In dismissing the application, judge Shanaaz Mia said granting it would be tantamount to a gagging order.

Mpambani had approached the high court on an urgent basis to have actress Amanda Du-Pont and arts and culture spokesperson Masechaba Khumalo remove social media posts in which they claim they were raped by her son, Molemo "Jub Jub" Maarohanye.

Du-Pont had also alleged that Mama Jackie used muti, and she had witnessed this.

As part of her application, Mpambani wanted a retraction and public apology from the pair. But Mia said she was not satisfied that Mama Jackie made out a case for urgency. Mia also slapped her with a costs order.

In an interview last month, Maarohanye claimed to have “smashed” Du-Pont — a reference to having sex with somebody. Du-Pont is known for her role as Lelo in Skeem Saam.

Maarohanye boasted to Podcast and Chill host MacG (MacGyver Mukwevho) that he later cheated on Du-Pont with singer Kelly Khumalo after the singer used “muti” to seduce him.

Du-Pont reacted with an emotional 17-minute video posted on Instagram, accusing Maarohanye of repeatedly raping and abusing her for two years. She also made several allegations against Mpambani.

In her arguments read by her counsel, advocate Vicky Olivier, Mpambani alleged her life had been under threat since the publishing of those statements on social media, saying people saw her as a witch.

According to Olivier, Mpambani was almost attacked by a mob at Southgate Mall. She also claimed that she had strangers walking past her house hurling insults, with some going as far as pointing fingers at her.

"The applicant is not seeking for respondents to be silenced, but what she is doing here is an attempt to preserve her dignity and good name," Olivier told the court, saying Mpambani had "paid a huge price" for previously not responding to such allegations.

Mia, however, said the alleged insults could not be directly linked to what was posted by Du-Pont and Khumalo as there had already been some negative publicity about Mpambani before the publishing of statements made by the duo.

In response, counsel for Du-Pont and Khumalo, advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, told the court that what Mama Jackie was asking for was to silence rape victims.

"What she asked for is a gagging order and it should not be granted because it is direct infringement. What makes it more inappropriate is that it is suppressing the ability of rape victims to speak their truth. It’s saying to them, 'Never repeat the fact that you were raped,'" Ngcukaitobi said.

There also needed to be a distinction in terms of what Du-Pont is accused of saying, he told the court.

"The entire basis for urgency is that she has been called a witch. It is Ms Mpambani who calls herself a witch. She [Du-Pont] said she uses muti. There is no link between muti and witchcraft. Muti is medicine, it’s just like Panado."

Earlier, Olivier told the court that Maarohanye was not party to the matter and should be kept out of the proceedings.

Ngcukaitobi, however, said Maarohanye was the beneficiary of the application.

"The videos and posts were about being raped by the son of the applicant. The mother of the accused is a peripheral player. This application is crafted in a way that misleads. This is suppression of the truth about sexual predation of the applicant’s son."

TimesLIVE


subscribe

Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.